導(dǎo)語：夏洛蒂筆下的.簡愛卻把她倔強(qiáng)的性格,獨(dú)立的個(gè)性留給我們一個(gè)感動(dòng).所以她是成功的,幸福的女性.接下來就讓我們一起來了解簡愛讀后感英文版怎么寫吧。希望文章能夠幫助到你！

　　簡愛讀后感英文版1

　　Oliver Twist, one of the most famous worksof Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life inBritain in 18th century.

　　The author who himself was born in a poorfamily wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks ofthose cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneaththe narrow and dirty streets in London.

　　The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, anorphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He sufferedenormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading thetragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. Ifelt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and thebrutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodnesseventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end.        One of theplots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowedto recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. Hewent for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at hislessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime andhardship and poverty.

　　How can such a little boy who had alreadysuffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is thenature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in thenovel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty.Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those whoare kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

　　For me, the nature of goodness is one ofthe most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water isto fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On thecontrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the handthat gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and usefulperson. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also getsgratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people hehas helped and himself.

　　To my disappointment, nowadays some peopleseem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down onpeople’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to bewarm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in troubleand seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance tomoney and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object whileemotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showingtheir ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and evenhit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

　　Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness,of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the characterof the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, nobetter than a kind of vermin.’

　　That is to say a person without goodness isdestined to lose everything.

　　Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

　　簡愛讀后感英文版2

　　this is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. the story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit .

　　it seems to me that many readers’ english reading experience starts with jane eyer. i am of no exception. as we refer to the movie “jane eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

　　jane eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. since jane’s education in lowwood orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. the suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.as a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, jane got a chance to be a tutor in thornfield garden. there she made the acquaintance of lovely adele and that garden’s owner, rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: after jane and rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was jane eyer. the film has finally got a symbolist end: jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. after finding rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, jane chose to stay with him forever.

　　i don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, i would rather regard the section that jane began her teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i heard jane’s words “never in my life have i been awaken so happily.” for one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. but the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: there must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life that “l(fā)ife is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (by forrest gump’s mother, in the film “forrest gump”)

　　what’s more, this film didn’t end when jane left thornfield. for jane eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for rochester, how he can get salvation? the film gives the answer tentatively: jane eventually got back to rochester. in fact, when jane met rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant rochester would get retrieval because of jane. we can consider rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. the fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. after it, rochester got the mercy of the god and the love of the woman whom he loved. here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. the value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

　　life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the

　　beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. in the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

　　in this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. we are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the sargasso sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. it’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

　　heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. indubitably, “jane eyer” is one of them.