你的學(xué)校正在開(kāi)展“誠(chéng)信”教育，英語(yǔ)俱樂(lè)部為配合這次活動(dòng)將舉行一次演講比賽。請(qǐng)根據(jù)下表所提示的要點(diǎn)，寫一篇演講稿。
朋友李雷 ★愛(ài)踢足球、玩游戲，考試舞弊 ★學(xué)習(xí)退步，不被信任
你的觀點(diǎn) ★誠(chéng)信考試,獨(dú)立完成作業(yè) ★說(shuō)實(shí)話,做誠(chéng)實(shí)孩子 ★(請(qǐng)補(bǔ)充一點(diǎn))
要 求:
1)短文應(yīng)包括表格中的`所有內(nèi)容,可適當(dāng)發(fā)揮;
2)詞數(shù)90左右,不包含已給出句子的詞數(shù);
3)演講稿中不得出現(xiàn)你的真實(shí)姓名和校名。
參考詞匯：cheat in the exam; fall behind (落后)
Hello，everyone! It’s a great honor to give a speech here.
That’s all. Thank you for listening!
參考范文一
Hello，everyone! It's a great honor to give a speech here. I’d like to tell you something about my friend Li Lei. He likes playing football and he also likes computer games. To get good grades, he often cheats in the exams. As a result, he gradually falls behind other students. What’s worse, he isn’t trusted by others.
So I think we should be honest in the exams. And it’s important to do homework by ourselves. We ought to tell the truth and be honest students. If we promise to do something, we’d better try our best to keep the promise.
That's all Thank you for listening!
參考范文二
since the quality of honesty applies to all behaviors, one cannot refuse to consider factual information, for example, in an unbiased manner and still claim that one's knowledge, belief or position is an attempt to be truthful. such a belief is clearly a product of one's desires and simply has nothing to do with the human ability to know. basing one's positions on what one wants — rather than unbiased evidence gathering — is dishonest even when good intentions can be cited — after all even hitler could cite good intentions and intended glory for a select group of people. clearly then, an unbiased approach to the truth is a requirement of honesty.
because intentions are closely related to fairness and certainly affect the degree of honesty/dishonesty, there is a wide spread confusion about honesty--and a general belief that being dishonest means that one always correctly understands if their behavior is either honest or dishonest. self-perception of our morality is non-static and volatile. it's often at the moment we refuse to consider other perspectives that there is a clear indication we are not pursuing the truth, rather than simply and exclusively at the moment we can muster up evidence that we are right. socrates had much to say about truth, honesty and morality, and explained that if people really understood that their behavior was wrong — then they simply wouldn't do it — by definition. unfortunately, honesty in the western tradition has been marginalized to specific instances — perhaps because a thorough understanding of honesty collides with ideologies of all types. ideologies and idealism often exaggerate and suppress evidence in order to support their perspectives — at the expense of the truth. this process erodes the practice and understanding of honesty. to an ideologist the truth quite often becomes insignificant, what matters most are their ideals and what ever supports their desires to enjoy and spread those ideals.
human beings are inherently biased about what they believe to be good due to individual tastes & backgrounds, but once one understands that a decidedly biased approach to what is true — is inherently dishonest, one can also understand how idealism and ideology have poorly served the quest for an honest, moral society. both honesty and morality require that we base our opinions about what is good — upon unbiased ideas of what is true — rather than vice versa (determining what is true based on what we feel is good) — the way all ideologies would have us believe.
2016福州誠(chéng)信中考英語(yǔ)作文：誠(chéng)信教育演講稿
6.2017有關(guān)誠(chéng)信教育主題班會(huì)作文
7.中學(xué)生社會(huì)誠(chéng)信教育作文
本文來(lái)源：http://www.nvnqwx.com/zuowen/chengxin/2541947.htm